boofeng
Member
- Messages
- 92
So I finally tested all my tanks' GH and KH. Results first, and then some discussion.
Methodology
Test kit: recently opened API GH/KH test kit (drop test), expires 2018 and 2020.
Procedure: very clumsily, with each tank tested only once
Results
Tank: eremnopyge 45x30
Substrate: 1.5 to 2 inches of loose peat moss
dGH: 2 / dKH: 0
Tank: bitaeniata 45x30
Substrate: less than half inch Aquael fine quartz sand, extremely decayed Catappa leaves, peat granules above sand.
Additional remarks: loose peat in filter bag behind HMF filter, used to receive deionised water changes (stopped 3 months ago)
dGH: 3 / dKH: 0
Tank: Crenicichla 90x30
Substrate: just under 1 inch ADA Malaya, extremely decayed Catappa leaves, a lot of driftwood
Additional remarks: peat granules in filter bag behind HMF filter, used to receive deionised water changes (stopped 3 months ago)
dGH: 4 / dKH: 0
Tank: candidi 45x30 cm
Substrate: 1 inch thoroughly mixed 50/50 ADA Malaya and ANS bright sand
dGH: 6 / dKH: 3
Tank: diplotaenia 45x30 cm
Substrate: 1 inch loose peat moss capped with 1 inch gardening sand
dGH: 7 / dKH: 3
Tank: trifasciata/Abacaxis 90x40
Substrate: baked clay above LECA pellets
Remarks: more than one year old
dGH: 9 / dKH: 5
For reference, my tapwater was dGH 6 and dKH 6 from a long ago test. IIRC.
Discussion
From my results, it seems that having ADA soil or peat moss or decaying Catappa leaves in contact with the water column tends to bring dKH readings to 0 and dGH readings to 2-4. No wonder all the local apisto guys stick to ADA soil and Catappa leaves - they do seem to work!
The exception is the candidi tank, which has some ADA Malaya, but reads dGH 6, dKH 3. I'm guessing there aren't enough peat-like substances there (no Catappa, too little ADA soil) to capture the 2+ ions.
I also found that Ceratophyllum is a rather decent indicator of whether my water is good for apistos - they melt in all the tanks with "good" water parameters. Oh, except the bitaeniata tank. Somehow the hornwort does fine there although the water reads dGH 3 dKH 0. Help me figure this out, someone?
Sadly, I found out about all these only today. The candidi have spawned at least twice, and the diplotaenia once, with no fry to show for it. I only measured the peat-filtered water going into all my tanks, and assumed those parameters would hold in the tank. Seems like I have some mineral source in the substrate or earthenware caves pushing GH and KH, and by extension probably pH, back up. I've just put in filter bags of peat granules to those tanks and hopefully that works. I'll report back.
Lastly, the trifasciata tank reads high unsurprisingly because the substrate is baked clay made from construction site waste soil. I removed quite a few rusty nails, tile shards, and bits of broken concrete while prepping it for the tank. The plants seem to love it though, and the trifasciata spawn profusely there. I have CRS living in a breeder box there too - no problems.
All in all, a good evening of sleuthing and learning.
Cheers
Bufeng
Methodology
Test kit: recently opened API GH/KH test kit (drop test), expires 2018 and 2020.
Procedure: very clumsily, with each tank tested only once
Results
Tank: eremnopyge 45x30
Substrate: 1.5 to 2 inches of loose peat moss
dGH: 2 / dKH: 0
Tank: bitaeniata 45x30
Substrate: less than half inch Aquael fine quartz sand, extremely decayed Catappa leaves, peat granules above sand.
Additional remarks: loose peat in filter bag behind HMF filter, used to receive deionised water changes (stopped 3 months ago)
dGH: 3 / dKH: 0
Tank: Crenicichla 90x30
Substrate: just under 1 inch ADA Malaya, extremely decayed Catappa leaves, a lot of driftwood
Additional remarks: peat granules in filter bag behind HMF filter, used to receive deionised water changes (stopped 3 months ago)
dGH: 4 / dKH: 0
Tank: candidi 45x30 cm
Substrate: 1 inch thoroughly mixed 50/50 ADA Malaya and ANS bright sand
dGH: 6 / dKH: 3
Tank: diplotaenia 45x30 cm
Substrate: 1 inch loose peat moss capped with 1 inch gardening sand
dGH: 7 / dKH: 3
Tank: trifasciata/Abacaxis 90x40
Substrate: baked clay above LECA pellets
Remarks: more than one year old
dGH: 9 / dKH: 5
For reference, my tapwater was dGH 6 and dKH 6 from a long ago test. IIRC.
Discussion
From my results, it seems that having ADA soil or peat moss or decaying Catappa leaves in contact with the water column tends to bring dKH readings to 0 and dGH readings to 2-4. No wonder all the local apisto guys stick to ADA soil and Catappa leaves - they do seem to work!
The exception is the candidi tank, which has some ADA Malaya, but reads dGH 6, dKH 3. I'm guessing there aren't enough peat-like substances there (no Catappa, too little ADA soil) to capture the 2+ ions.
I also found that Ceratophyllum is a rather decent indicator of whether my water is good for apistos - they melt in all the tanks with "good" water parameters. Oh, except the bitaeniata tank. Somehow the hornwort does fine there although the water reads dGH 3 dKH 0. Help me figure this out, someone?
Sadly, I found out about all these only today. The candidi have spawned at least twice, and the diplotaenia once, with no fry to show for it. I only measured the peat-filtered water going into all my tanks, and assumed those parameters would hold in the tank. Seems like I have some mineral source in the substrate or earthenware caves pushing GH and KH, and by extension probably pH, back up. I've just put in filter bags of peat granules to those tanks and hopefully that works. I'll report back.
Lastly, the trifasciata tank reads high unsurprisingly because the substrate is baked clay made from construction site waste soil. I removed quite a few rusty nails, tile shards, and bits of broken concrete while prepping it for the tank. The plants seem to love it though, and the trifasciata spawn profusely there. I have CRS living in a breeder box there too - no problems.
All in all, a good evening of sleuthing and learning.
Cheers
Bufeng